Computational Optimization of Nanomaterial Sensors for Explosive Detection: A Multi-Parameter Study of Selectivity and Environmental Stability
Main Article Content
Abstract
Trace explosive residue detection is still an important and pressing issue in security scanning, forensic science, and anti-terrorism missions. In this paper, a thorough comparative simulation analysis of four nanomaterial-based sensor technologies, namely Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (SWCNT), Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes (MWCNT), reduced Graphene Oxide (rGO), and Zinc Oxide Nanowires (ZnO NW), for the detection of three major explosive materials: 2,4,6-Trinitrotoluene (TNT), cyclotrimethylenetrinitramine (RDX), and Triacetone Triperoxide (TATP), is conducted. Based on simulation parameters obtained from 47 peer-reviewed articles (2020-2024), the performance of the sensors was assessed for 108 experimental settings, including different temperatures (10°C, 25°C, 40°C) and humidity conditions (30%, 60%, 90%). The results showed that each nanomaterial has its own unique strengths : ZnO nanowires had the highest sensitivity (0.2 ng/mL LOD) and selectivity (95%) for TNT detection, rGO sensors outperformed in TATP detection (0.4 ng/mL LOD, 93% selectivity) and were highly resistant to environmental conditions (92% signal retention at 90% RH), MWCNT sensors had well-rounded performance for multiple types of explosives (83.3% average selectivity), and SWCNT sensors had fast response times (25 seconds) but poor humidity tolerance. The overall performance ranking revealed rGO as the best-performing material (score: 35.8/40), followed by MWCNT (score: 29.3/40). The results obtained suggest that the optimal sensor choice is application-dependent and not generalizable, thus facilitating the design of multi-sensor array systems that can harness the unique advantages of various nanomaterial platforms for improved explosive detection capabilities.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2026 Arooj A, et al.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
1. Hotchkiss PJ. Explosive threats: The challenges they present and approaches to countering them. In: Handbook of Security Science. Springer; 2022. p. 829-851. Available from: https://link.springer.com/rwe/10.1007/978-3-319-91875-4_19
2. Kouros KD. The use of space-based assets for enhancing EU’s security: An analysis of the role of satellites in detecting internal security threats. 2025. Available from: https://www.openarchives.gr/aggregator-openarchives/edm/pergamos/000005-uoadl:3479334?language=en
3. Alam N, Abid, Islam S. Advancements in trace and low humidity sensors technologies using nanomaterials: A review. ACS Appl Nano Mater. 2024;7(12):13836-13864. Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsanm.4c01760
4. Ku CA, Chung CK. Advances in humidity nanosensors and their application. Sensors. 2023;23(4):2328. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/s23042328
5. Norizan MN, Moklis MH, Ngah Demon SZ, Halim NA, Samsuri A, Mohamad IS, et al. Carbon nanotubes: Functionalisation and their application in chemical sensors. RSC Adv. 2020;10(71):43704-43732. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9058486/
6. Ferrier DC, Honeychurch KC. Carbon nanotube (CNT)-based biosensors. Biosensors. 2021;11(12):486. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11120486
7. Liu J, Bao S, Wang X. Applications of graphene-based materials in sensors: A review. Micromachines. 2022;13(2):184. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/mi13020184
8. Shahdeo D, Roberts A, Abbineni N, Gandhi S. Graphene based sensors. In: Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry. Elsevier; 2020. p. 175-199. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7518956/
9. Verma ML, Sukriti, Dhanya BS, Saini R, Das A, Varma RS. Synthesis and application of graphene-based sensors in biology: A review. Environ Chem Lett. 2022;20(3):2189-2212. Available from: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022EnvCL..20.2189V/abstract
10. Zeng H, Zhang G, Nagashima K, Takahashi T, Hosomi T, Yanagida T. Metal-oxide nanowire molecular sensors and their promises. Chemosensors. 2021;9(2):41. Available from: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9040/9/2/41
11. Comini E. Metal oxides nanowires chemical/gas sensors: Recent advances. Mater Today Adv. 2020;7:100099. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtadv.2020.100099
12. Junaid HM, Waseem MT, Khan ZA, Gul H, Yu C, Shaikh AJ, et al. Fluorescent and colorimetric sensors for selective detection of TNT and TNP explosives in aqueous medium through fluorescence emission enhancement mechanism. J Photochem Photobiol A Chem. 2022;428:113865. Available from: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022JPPA..42813865J/abstract
13. Durmazel S, Üzer A, Apak R. “All-in-a-tube” detection of RDX and TNT: Old silver mirror reaction revived for nitro-explosive quantification. Microchim Acta. 2025;192(6):344. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00604-025-07195-w
14. Cheng X, Cai Z, Dong J, Li J, Zhao C, Ma J, et al. One-step, specific, and fluorescent sensing of pg-level TATP via intramolecular hydrogen bond breaking in Eu-MOFs. Aggregate. 2026;7(2):e70294. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agt2.70294
15. Fasasi ST, Adebowale OJ, Nwokediegwu ZQS. Sensor technology performance under environmental interference: A comparative evaluation model. Int J Sci Res Comput Sci Eng Inf Technol. 2024;10(3):843-855. Available from: https://ijsrcseit.com/index.php/home/article/view/CSEIT25113468
16. Kang Y, Aye L, Ngo TD, Zhou J. Performance evaluation of low-cost air quality sensors: A review. Sci Total Environ. 2022;818:151769. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.151769
17. Bulemo PM, Kim DH, Shin H, Cho HJ, Koo WT, Choi SJ, et al. Selectivity in chemiresistive gas sensors: Strategies and challenges. Chem Rev. 2025;125(8):4111-4183. Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.4c00592
18. Siddiqui MUA, Qamar F, Ahmed F, Nguyen QN, Hassan R. Interference management in 5G and beyond network: Requirements, challenges and future directions. IEEE Access. 2021;9:68932-68965. Available from: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9405679
19. To KC, Ben-Jaber S, Parkin IP. Recent developments in the field of explosive trace detection. ACS Nano. 2020;14(9):10804-10833. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c01579
20. Adegoke O, Nic Daeid N. Colorimetric optical nanosensors for trace explosive detection using metal nanoparticles: Advances, pitfalls, and future perspective. Emerg Top Life Sci. 2021;5(3):367-379. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1042/etls20200281