Reviewer's Responsibilities

Peer reviewers play a vital role in maintaining the quality and credibility of forensic science research published in the Journal of Forensic Science and Research (JFSR). This document outlines the key responsibilities of reviewers to ensure fairness, accuracy, and ethical integrity in the peer review process.

Core Responsibilities

  • Provide a timely, thorough, and unbiased assessment of the manuscript.
  • Evaluate originality, methodology, results, and ethical compliance of submitted work.
  • Maintain confidentiality of the manuscript and review process.
  • Disclose any conflicts of interest that could bias their evaluation.
  • Offer constructive, respectful, and evidence-based feedback to authors.

Confidentiality

Reviewers must treat all manuscripts and related data as confidential. Information may not be disclosed, shared, or used for personal advantage prior to publication.

Objectivity and Fairness

Reviews must be objective, focusing on the scientific merit of the manuscript. Reviewers should avoid personal criticism of authors and provide recommendations grounded in evidence and reasoning.

Identifying Ethical Concerns

Reviewers are expected to alert editors to suspected ethical issues such as:

  • Plagiarism or excessive text overlap with published works.
  • Data falsification, fabrication, or inappropriate statistical methods.
  • Failure to adhere to human/animal research ethical standards.
  • Improper authorship practices or undeclared conflicts of interest.

Timeliness

Reviewers must respect deadlines. If unable to complete a review on time, they should promptly inform the editor and, if possible, recommend alternative qualified reviewers.

Providing Constructive Feedback

Feedback should:

  • Highlight strengths and contributions of the manuscript.
  • Identify weaknesses, errors, or unclear areas with specific suggestions for improvement.
  • Be clear, respectful, and supportive of author development.

Conflict of Interest

Reviewers must decline assignments if conflicts exist, including personal relationships with authors, financial interests, or competitive research overlap.

Collaboration and Transparency

Reviewers may not involve colleagues, students, or collaborators in the review without prior approval from the editor. If assistance is sought, the names of additional contributors must be disclosed.

Recognition

JFSR acknowledges reviewer contributions through certificates, annual acknowledgments, and integration with Publons/ORCID platforms.

FAQs

What if I suspect plagiarism?

Notify the editor with evidence. Do not contact the authors directly.

Can I recommend acceptance or rejection?

Yes, but the final decision rests with the editor.

Am I allowed to cite unpublished work reviewed?

No. Reviewers must not use or cite unpublished materials from manuscripts.

Commitment to Excellence

By fulfilling these responsibilities, reviewers ensure the integrity, fairness, and quality of the peer review process at JFSR, strengthening trust in forensic science research.