Reviewer Guidelines

Peer review is the foundation of credible academic publishing. The Journal of Forensic Science and Research (JFSR) depends on the expertise and integrity of reviewers to evaluate manuscripts fairly and constructively. These guidelines outline the expectations, responsibilities, and ethical principles that reviewers must uphold.

Role of Reviewers

Reviewers provide expert, objective, and constructive evaluations of manuscripts. Their feedback helps editors make informed decisions and assists authors in improving the quality of their work.

Reviewer Responsibilities

• Provide an unbiased and objective assessment of the manuscript.
• Maintain confidentiality of all materials and communications.
• Submit reviews within the agreed timeline or request extensions when necessary.
• Disclose conflicts of interest that could influence judgment.
• Offer constructive feedback that highlights both strengths and weaknesses.

Evaluation Criteria

Reviewers should assess manuscripts based on the following:

• Originality and novelty of research.
• Clarity of objectives, methodology, and results.
• Appropriateness of data analysis and interpretation.
• Adherence to ethical standards (human/animal research, informed consent, data integrity).
• Relevance to the scope of forensic science.

Confidentiality

Conflict of Interest

Reviewers must decline invitations if they have any personal, financial, or institutional conflicts of interest with the manuscript’s authors or subject matter.

Constructive Feedback

Reviews should highlight positive aspects as well as areas needing improvement. Comments must be respectful, clear, and evidence-based.

Ethical Oversight

Reviewers should alert editors to potential ethical issues, such as:

• Plagiarism or overlap with other published works.
• Data manipulation, falsification, or fabrication.
• Failure to meet ethical standards in research involving humans or animals.

Reviewer Recognition

JFSR values the contribution of reviewers. Acknowledgment may be provided through reviewer certificates, listing in annual reports, or recognition in Publons/ORCID.

FAQs

How much time do I have to complete a review?

Typically 2–3 weeks, though extensions may be granted if requested.

Can I suggest acceptance or rejection?

Yes, but the final decision rests with the editor.

What if I cannot review a manuscript?

Notify the editor immediately and, if possible, recommend alternate qualified reviewers.

Commitment to Quality

By following these guidelines, reviewers ensure fairness, uphold integrity, and strengthen the scientific rigor of publications in forensic science.