Editor's Guidelines

The Journal of Forensic Science and Research (JFSR) relies on its editorial board to uphold academic excellence, integrity, and transparency. These Editor’s Guidelines provide comprehensive instructions for editors to ensure consistent handling of submissions, fair peer review, and compliance with international publishing ethics.

Role of Editors

Editors serve as custodians of academic quality. Their duties include overseeing peer review, ensuring ethical compliance, guiding reviewers, and making unbiased decisions based on the scientific merit of manuscripts.

Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions must be made independently of institutional, political, or financial influence. Editors must declare conflicts of interest and recuse themselves if impartiality is compromised.

Manuscript Handling

  • Ensure that all manuscripts undergo initial quality checks, including plagiarism screening.
  • Select appropriate peer reviewers with expertise in the manuscript subject area.
  • Communicate clearly with reviewers and authors regarding timelines and expectations.
  • Monitor timely completion of peer reviews and revisions.

Decision-Making Responsibilities

Editors must make decisions solely based on the manuscript’s quality, relevance, originality, and contribution to the field of forensic science, without bias toward author nationality, gender, or institutional affiliation.

Ethical Oversight

Editors are responsible for identifying and addressing potential ethical concerns such as:

  • Plagiarism and duplicate submission.
  • Fabrication or falsification of data.
  • Inadequate disclosure of conflicts of interest.
  • Improper authorship practices.

Communication with Authors

Editors must communicate decisions respectfully and transparently. Constructive feedback should guide authors toward improving their work. Appeals must be considered fairly and independently.

Reviewer Management

Editors should:

  • Assign reviewers based on expertise and avoid conflicts of interest.
  • Ensure confidentiality of the peer review process.
  • Provide reviewers with clear evaluation criteria and deadlines.
  • Appreciate reviewers’ contributions and acknowledge their service to the journal.

Confidentiality

Editors must protect the confidentiality of submitted manuscripts, reviewer identities, and author information, sharing details only with those directly involved in the publication process.

Handling Complaints

Complaints or appeals must be addressed promptly, following COPE’s recommended practices. If necessary, independent experts may be consulted to resolve disputes.

Editorial Integrity and Training

Editors are encouraged to participate in professional development programs to remain updated on evolving publishing standards, peer review innovations, and ethical frameworks.

FAQs

Can an editor submit to the journal?

Yes, but they must not be involved in the review or decision-making process of their own submission.

What if misconduct is suspected?

Editors must follow COPE flowcharts to ensure fair and transparent investigation.

How long should decisions take?

Editors should strive to provide decisions within 6–8 weeks of submission, depending on review timelines.

Commitment to Excellence

By adhering to these guidelines, editors at JFSR ensure that the journal maintains its credibility, fosters scientific integrity, and contributes meaningfully to the advancement of forensic science research.