Human Environmental DNA: A New Frontier in Forensic Biology

Main Article Content

Nyasa Pandey

Abstract

Environmental DNA (eDNA) refers to genetic material recovered from environmental matrices without requiring direct collection of an intact biological specimen. In forensic science, human eDNA may originate from shed epithelial cells, hair-associated material, saliva-containing droplets, blood, urine, and other cellular material deposited into air, dust, soil, water, and surfaces. This review examines the forensic potential of human eDNA with emphasis on environmental sources, sampling, extraction, molecular analysis, transfer and persistence, contamination, mixture interpretation, validation and Indian forensic implementation. Unlike conventional biological evidence, environmental DNA may be low-template, degraded, heterogeneous, and affected by primary or secondary transfer. Therefore, detection of a DNA profile should not by itself be interpreted as proof of the timing, mechanism or activity associated with deposition. The review identifies the need for matrix-specific sampling protocols, validated analytical workflows, quality assurance, chain of custody, inter-laboratory studies and scientifically supported interpretation. Current and emerging approaches including STR profiling, massively parallel sequencing, digital PCR, metagenomics, portable sequencing and computational analysis may expand forensic applications, but require appropriate validation before routine casework use. Human eDNA is best considered a complementary source of forensic information while its analytical and interpretive foundations continue to develop.

Article Details

Pandey, N. (2026). Human Environmental DNA: A New Frontier in Forensic Biology. Journal of Forensic Science and Research, 99–130. https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jfsr.1001121
Review Articles

Copyright (c) 2026 Pandey N.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

1. Taberlet P, Bonin A, Zinger L, Coissac E. Environmental DNA: For biodiversity research and monitoring. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2018. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198767220.001.0001.

2. Barnes MA, Turner CR. The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics. Conserv Genet. 2016;17:1 17. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10592-015-0775-4.

3. Saha N, Singh N, Samuel M. Environmental DNA (eDNA) from humans: Review of recent advancements and forensic implications. Int J Legal Med. 2026. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00414-026-03911-0.

4. Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol Lett. 2008;4(4):423 425. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118.

5. Rees HC, Maddison BC, Middleditch DJ, Patmore JR, Gough KC. The detection of aquatic animal species using environmental DNA—A review of eDNA as a survey tool in ecology. J Appl Ecol. 2014;51(5):1450 1459. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1365-2664.12306.

6. Goray M, Taylor D, Bibbo E, Fantinato C, Fonneløp AE, Gill P, van Oorschot RAH. Emerging use of air eDNA and its application to forensic investigations—A review. Electrophoresis. 2024;45(9 10):916 932. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/elps.202300228.

7. van Oorschot RAH, Ballantyne KN, Mitchell RJ. Forensic trace DNA: A review. Investig Genet. 2010;1:14. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-1-14.

8. Burrill J, Daniel B, Frascione N. A review of trace “touch DNA” deposits: Variability factors and an exploration of cellular composition. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019;39:8 18. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2018.11.019.

9. Dass MA, Sherman CDH, Nai YH, Ellis MR, van Oorschot RAH, Durdle A. Assessing the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) as a tool in the detection of human DNA in water. J Forensic Sci. 2022;67(6):2299 2307. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15124.

10. Goldberg CS, Turner CR, Deiner K, Klymus KE, Thomsen PF, Murphy MA, Spear SF, McKee A, Oyler McCance SJ, Cornman RS, Laramie MB, Mahon AR, Lance RF, Pilliod DS, Strickler KM, Waits LP, Fremier AK, Takahara T, Herder JE, Taberlet P. Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species. Methods Ecol Evol. 2016;7(11):1299 1307. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12595.

11. Boom R, Sol CJA, Salimans MMM, Jansen CL, Wertheim van Dillen PME, van der Noordaa J. Rapid and simple method for purification of nucleic acids. J Clin Microbiol. 1990;28(3):495 503. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.28.3.495-503.1990.

12. Deiner K, Renshaw MA, Li Y, Olds BP, Lodge DM, Pfrender ME. Long range PCR allows sequencing of environmental DNA from diverse aquatic systems. Mol Ecol Resour. 2017;17(3):e129 e139. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12620.

13. Lewis M, Lainé K, Dawnay L, Lamont D, Scott K, Mariani S, Hänfling B, Dawnay N. The forensic potential of environmental DNA (eDNA) in freshwater wildlife crime investigations: From research to application. Sci Justice. 2024;64(4):443 454. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.scijus.2024.06.003.

14. Machida M, Kibayashi K. STR analysis of human DNA recovered from bathwater and other water samples for forensic identification. PLoS One. 2026;21(3):e0345878. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0345878.

15. Ghemrawi M, Ramírez Torres A, Duncan G, Colwell R, Dadlani M, McCord B. The genital microbiome and its potential for detecting sexual assault. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2021;51:102432. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fsigen.2020.

16. Whitmore L, McCauley M, Farrell JA, et al. Inadvertent human genomic bycatch and intentional capture raise beneficial applications and ethical concerns with environmental DNA. Nat Ecol Evol. 2023;7:873 888. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41559-023-02056-2.

17. Bibbo E, Taylor D, van Oorschot RAH, Goray M. Air DNA forensics: Novel air collection method investigations for human DNA identification. J Forensic Sci. 2025;70(1):298 313. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15662.

18. European Network of Forensic Science Institutes (ENFSI). Guideline for internal validation/verification of DNA profiling methods (DNA GDL 002). 2024. Available from: https://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/ENFSI-Validation-Guideline-04012024.pdf.

19. Scientific Working Group on DNA Analysis Methods (SWGDAM). SWGDAM validation guidelines for DNA analysis methods: Overview document. 2026. Available from: https://www.swgdam.org/publications.

20. Butler JM, Iyer HK, Press RA, Taylor M, Vallone PM, Willis S. DNA mixture interpretation: A NIST scientific foundation review (NISTIR 8351). Gaithersburg (MD): National Institute of Standards and Technology; 2024. Available from: https://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8351.

21. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 21043 1:2025. Forensic sciences—Part 1: Vocabulary. Geneva: ISO; 2025. Available from: https://www.iso.org/standard/87128.html.