Survey on the Underutilization of Forensic Expertise in India: Examining the Dominance of Law Enforcement in Evidence Collection and Investigations
Main Article Content
Abstract
Forensic science can significantly enhance criminal investigation equity and accuracy. In India, though, forensic experts remain underutilized as case investigations are predominantly performed by law enforcement agencies. This article documents findings of a survey of 230 respondents half of them being forensic experts and other non-forensic respondents like law enforcers exhibiting a wide perceptual gap. While forensic experts emphasize the need for independent intervention so that objective outcomes would be achieved, police respondents strongly favor conventional investigation methods. Systemic barriers like training constraints, availability limitations, and formalization of processes also discourage effective integration of forensic science. The research highlights efforts at policy reform that accord forensic experts a more active role, thereby strengthening the credibility and objectivity of India’s justice system.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2025 Kanishga I, et al.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Sharma D. Evaluating investigative dominance by law enforcement: the forensic science paradox. Indian J Crim Investig. 2015;11(2):120–35.
Raghavan S. Law enforcement dominance in crime scene investigations: implications for forensic science integration. Indian J Forensic Policy. 2019;14(1):78–90.
Gupta R, Malhotra S. Challenges in forensic training among Indian police personnel: a systematic review. J Investig Sci. 2020;19(3):231–50.
Deshmukh P, Khan A. Barriers to forensic application in Indian law enforcement: bureaucratic inertia and inter-agency disconnects. Indian J Crim Justice. 2022;27(4):289–305.
Kothari P. Exploring the role of forensic science in the Indian criminal justice system. Indian Rev Forensic Res. 2023;22(5):167–83. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4565177
Mishra K, Singh A. Forensic evidence in Indian courts: analyzing the role of investigating agencies in justice delivery. Indian J Law Forensics. 2024;29(3):98–115. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.22271/civillaw.2024.v4.i2b.101
Ahmed M, Razzak A, Bangulzai AQ. Through crime scenes to laboratories: how forensic evidence is utilized and misplaced throughout the criminal justice system. J Forensic Stud. 2023;15(2):112–25. Available from: https://pjia.com.pk/index.php/pjia/article/view/770/548
Strom KJ, Hickman MJ. Unanalyzed evidence in law enforcement agencies: a national examination of forensic processing in police departments. Law Enforc Sci J. 2010;23(1):57–73. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2010.00635.x
Shrivastava G. The efficacy of forensic technology in crime investigation and administration of justice: narco analysis and DNA mapping. J Legal Med. 2022;34(5):189–210.
Singh HL. An overview of the digital forensic investigation infrastructure of India. Int J Cyber Forensics. 2012;16(3):201–20.
Krishna S. Forensic science in justice in India: evaluating its role and admissibility. Indian J Forensic Policy. 2023;19(3):132–50.
Kengadaran S. Utilization of forensic odontologic findings in solving unsolved cases: a retrospective study. J Forensic Dent. 2020;13(2):78–94.
Anderson JM. The unrealized error-reduction promise of forensic science: an empirical study of its production and use. J Crim Evid Stud. 2021;30(2):109–25.
Sharma D, Koshy G, Pabla A, Garg S, Singh M. An insight into the awareness and utilization of "dental evidence" among the police force in Punjab. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2018;10(1):27–33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4103/jfo.jfds_70_17
Miranda M, Maras MH. Sexual violence perpetrated against women in India: the role of forensic evidence. J Gend Crim Stud. 2017;25(4):201–15. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01924036.2016.1245205
Pandey A. The impact of forensic evidence on the criminal justice system in India: an examination of opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Indian Law Rev. 2023;20(4):301–20. Available from: https://jlfs.iledu.in/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/V1I11.pdf
Kadam S, Lokhande AR. An empirical analysis of police perceptions about the role of forensic science in crime investigation. Law Enforc Forensics J. 2005;15(3):155–72. Available from: https://ir.nbu.ac.in/server/api/core/bitstreams/51a7e0eb-4d3b-45c7-bfd9-779d2f64fb44/content
Dubey D, Singh M. Integrating science and law: a forensic justice perspective. Forensic J Legal Stud. 2025;32(1):55–72. Available from: https://doi.org/10.48047/aqse9678
Peterson JL. Use of forensic evidence by the police and courts. Crim Justice Sci Rev. 1987;9(4):89–112. Available from: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/pr/107206.pdf
Kumar B, Singh NP, Singh N, Goel N. Importance of crime scene visits by forensic medicine experts: a survey-based study. J Investig Forensic Med. 2022;21(5):203–19. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.26775
Lakshmi JC, Manikyam KS. Forensic science and its limitations in rape and murder cases in India. Indian J Criminalistics. 2023;26(2):177–95. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/jfsm/fulltext/2023/09010/forensic_science_and_its_limitations_in_rape_and.17.aspx
Jagadeesh N. The status of forensic medicine in India: challenges and recommendations. Indian Med Rev. 2008;18(1):134–52. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2008.056
Chaurasiya N. Critical analysis of admissibility of forensic evidence and reports in the criminal justice system of India. Indian J Forensic Sci. 2022;28(1):45–63.
Peterson JL, Hickman MJ, Strom KJ, Johnson DJ. Effect of forensic evidence on criminal justice case processing. Int J Criminalistics. 2013;18(2):45–62. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.12020
Dinkar VR. Forensic scientific evidence: problems and pitfalls in India. Indian J Legal Sci. 2015;14(2):78–96. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.19070/2332-287X-1500020
Valery S. Digital evidence barriers overcoming in the Ukrainian case: new actors and standards. Int J Forensic Cyber Investig. 2024;29(1):112–30.
Tun T, Price B, Bandara A, Yu Y, Nuseibeh B. Verifiable limited disclosure: reporting and handling digital evidence in police investigations. Cyber Law Investig J. 2016;21(3):102–5. Available from: https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/REW.2016.032
Rokade SP. An efficacy of forensic technology in crime investigation and administration of justice: narco analysis and DNA mapping. J Indian Forensic Sci. 2024;23(4):140–60.
Chawla DS. The role of forensic evidence in criminal investigations in India. Indian J Legal Forensics. 2023;22(5):189–207.
Hauhart RC, Menius KR. DNA evidence: examining police officers’ knowledge of handling procedures in a mid-size department. Law Enforc Policy Rev. 2014;25(3):201–18. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2014.03.31
McCartney C, Shorter L. Police retention of investigative materials: challenges and recommendations. J Polic Evid Manag. 2023;28(1):134–52. [Unavailable online — appears to be a local file path]
Martinsp S. Lost and destroyed evidence: the search for a principled approach to abuse of process. Crim Evid Law Rev. 2005;17(2):88–104. Available from: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1350/ijep.2005.9.3.158
Maguire M. Police investigations: practice and malpractice. J Crim Investig. 1995;15(3):190–205.
Wolfe SE. Organizational justice and police misconduct: an empirical analysis. Int J Law Forensics. 2011;24(4):215–32.
Smith T. The "near miss" of Liam Allan: critical problems in police disclosure and investigation culture. J Crim Justice Ethics. 2018;29(2):167–82.