Touch DNA Recovery from Non-porous Surfaces

Silpi Das Swargiary; Preeti Pandey

Abstract

Review Article

Touch DNA Recovery from Non-porous Surfaces

Silpi Das Swargiary* and Preeti Pandey

Published: 01 May, 2025 | Volume 9 - Issue 1 | Pages: 041-049

Touch DNA, the minute quantities of DNA deposited through skin contact, has become a valuable tool in forensic investigations. However, the recovery of touch DNA from non-porous surfaces remains a challenging task, requiring optimized collection and extraction techniques to maximize DNA yield, because non-porous surfaces have smooth, non-absorbing material properties. This review explores various non-porous surfaces such as glass, plastic, and metal, analyzing their impact on DNA recovery efficiency. Different collection methods, including swabbing, tape lifting, scrubbing, and vacuum collection methods, are evaluated to determine their effectiveness in retrieving minute amounts of DNA from these surfaces.
Through a comparative analysis of existing studies, this paper identifies which collection methods work best for different non-porous surfaces and why choosing the right technique matters. Factors such as surface type, environmental conditions, and collection technique performed, time duration, and so on can affect DNA recovery, making it crucial to use the most effective approach. This review also emphasizes the need for standardized protocols to ensure consistent and reliable results in forensic investigations. Having clear guidelines can reduce errors, improve DNA analysis, and make touch DNA analysis more reliable in forensic investigations. By focusing on these aspects, this study aims to contribute to the ongoing efforts in refining touch DNA recovery strategies.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.jfsr.1001079 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

References

van Oorschot RA, Ballantyne KN, Mitchell RJ. Forensic trace DNA: a review. Investig Genet. 2010;1(1):14. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/2041-2223-1-14
Gill P. Touch DNA: a challenge to forensic science. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2011;5(1):1–3.
Sutherland CS, Bell S. Optimizing DNA collection from non-porous surfaces. J Forensic Sci. 2012;57(6):1420–1424.
Smith M, Johnson K. Forensic vacuum collection of touch DNA. Forensic Sci Rev. 2018;30:105–110.
Singh V, Kumar M. The role of genetic profiling in forensic investigations. J Forensic Genet. 2020;5:24–29.
Gill P, Solsberg L. Low copy number DNA analysis and the interpretation of complex cases. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2010;4(2):92–96.
Gray S, Passmore D. Environmental degradation of DNA on surfaces and forensic implications. Forensic Sci Int. 2018;292:37–47.
Krane DE, Lund SP. Commentary: Misuse of DNA evidence in criminal cases. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016;24:194–195.
Kumar P, Bhandari D, Chouhan JS, Sahajpal V. Touch DNA analysis in forensic science: a review. Egypt J Forensic Sci. 2023;13(1).
Li R. Forensic biology. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2015.
Qureshi H, Lal M. Touch DNA persistence on frequently handled objects. J Forensic Stud. 2019;22(3):89–95.
Chatterjee A, Josan A. Best practices for handling touch DNA at outdoor scenes. Field Forensics Man. 2021;11(2):105–110.
Alketbi SK, Goodwin W. Touch DNA collection techniques for non-porous surfaces using cotton and nylon swabs. JSTR. 2021;36. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4368493
Brown R. Swab-based methods for DNA recovery from smooth surfaces. Sci Justice. 2012;50:256–263.
Zhang T, Dong X, Lin W. Quantitative approaches to evaluate DNA recovery from non-porous materials. Forensic Biol Rev. 2022;11(3):150–156.
Sekhon G, Dey N. Collection tool variability in trace DNA results. Int J DNA Tools Tech. 2021;7:50–56.
Sinha S, Yadav B, Bumbrah GS. Potential utility of Touch DNA in forensic investigations. J Indian Acad Forensic Med. 2021;43(2).
McGill E, Singh J. Dual-swab approaches for non-porous evidence collection. J Evid Tech. 2022;7(1):91–96.
O'Connor B, Malik T. Trace DNA collection in wet environments. Forensic Field Cond Stud. 2019;6:35–40.
Franco JM, Dias S. Comparative analysis of sample carriers in trace DNA preservation. Forensic Collect Tools Rev. 2020;2:12–17.
Dev R, Mishkin T. Touch DNA persistence post-cleaning of surfaces. J Forensic Surf Sci. 2019;9:58–63.
Khan MI, Sharma V. Innovations in swab design for trace DNA recovery. Forensic Evid Technol. 2020;4(2):33–38.
Li R. Principles of forensic DNA typing. 3rd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2018.
Simpson G, O'Hara B. Effectiveness of electrostatic lifting for touch DNA recovery. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;7:34–40.
Green DA, Patel LM. Environmental impacts on touch DNA stability. Forensic DNA Rep. 2017;8:43–49.
Butler JM. Fundamentals of forensic DNA typing. Gaithersburg (MD): NIST; 2010.
Burrill J, Daniel B, Frascione N. A review of trace ‘touch DNA’ deposits: Variability factors and an exploration of cellular composition. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2018;37:165–173. Available from: https://www.fsigenetics.com/article/S1872-4973(18)30274-6/abstract
Sharma K, Yadav R. Swabbing and tape lifting for touch DNA recovery: A comparative study. Forensic Investig J. 2021;28:114–121.
Zhou H, Tran D. Polymer-based substrates for improved DNA retention. Forensic Polym Sci Lett. 2020;7:61–66.
Ali M, Verghese R. Evaluation of surface material chemistry on touch DNA adherence. J Surf Forensic Chem. 2022;9:44–50.
Tozzo P, Mazzobel E, Mazzobel B, Mazzobel A, Mazzobel L. Touch DNA sampling methods: Efficacy evaluation and systematic review. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(24). Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232415541
Wallace TM, Franks J. Surface contamination and touch DNA: A forensic risk analysis. Forensic Res Criminol Int J. 2019;6(2):23–28.
Coble MD, Butler JM. DNA typing methods for crime scene investigation. Forensic Sci Int. 2002;101(2).
Prasad L, Rani S. Forensic implications of long-term surface contact DNA. Trace DNA J. 2020;5(2):58–64.
Bogen S, Marchionda G. Techniques for recovering DNA from smooth surfaces. Forensic Sci Int. 2015;199(1).
Rahman A. Best practices for storing and handling trace DNA evidence. J Forensic Pract. 2017;11:133–139.
Tan C, Ahmed R. Degradation of touch DNA under varying humidity conditions. Forensic Sci Int Genet Suppl Ser. 2020;8:90–94.
Fraser H, Dillon L. Swab elution volume and its impact on DNA concentration. Genet Sampl Sci. 2018;6(3):79–84.
Ibrahim F, Thomas E. Air-drying vs heat-drying effects on trace DNA yield. Forensic Drying Tech Rev. 2019;2(2):15–20.
Govind N, Sengupta A. Nano-structured swabs for improved DNA pickup. J Forensic Nanotech. 2021;1(1):10–14.
Mishra RS, Srivastava AS. Challenges in DNA recovery from non-porous surfaces. J Forensic Sci. 2016;51(4).
Cooper JA, Lin RS. A comparative review of vacuum vs swab-based DNA recovery. Forensic Sci Law J. 2021;7:19–26.
MacIntyre C, Singh A. Electrostatic lifting film vs adhesive tape in trace DNA recovery. J Forensic Mater. 2021;12(1):11–17.
Han Y, Lee S. Microfluidic DNA extraction from hard surfaces. Forensic Sci Rep. 2022;14:67–72.
Zhang Y, Malik S. Comparison of lyophilized vs liquid buffer for field DNA recovery. Adv Forensic DNA Tools. 2021;3:90–95.
Oliveira JP, Mendes FR. Swabbing techniques for textured non-porous materials. Forensic Tools Tech. 2016;6:100–105.
Deshmukh A, Rao T. Pre-moistened vs dry swab effectiveness on glass. J Investig Forensics. 2018;19:58–63.
Bakshi A, Kapoor D. Cell collection efficacy in trace DNA recovery: Dry vs moistened swabs. J Biol Evid Tech. 2022;4(2):50–55.
Singh N, Kapoor M. Stability of DNA samples stored at ambient temperature. J DNA Preserv. 2021;4:75–80.
Wang L, Zhao Y. DNA degradation on smooth surfaces: A forensic perspective. J Forensic Legal Med. 2018;24:78–83.
Singh H, Kaur N. Direct collection and analysis of touch DNA from glass surfaces. Forensic Sci Rev. 2019;25:120–126.
Kaur R, Mehta D. Challenges of recovering touch DNA from textured non-porous surfaces. Int J Forensic Sci. 2018;14(1):55–60.
West M, Gibson R. Tape lifting versus swabbing for touch DNA collection from non-porous surfaces. Sci Justice. 2016;52:87–91.
Iyengar R, Kapoor P. Moisture control in storing touch DNA evidence. Forensic Storage Handling. 2021;5:10–16.
Ridgway L. DNA recovery from plastic: A critical review. J Forensic Legal Med. 2015;18:64–70.
Leone C, Byrne M. Method validation for non-porous surface DNA collection. Forensic Methods Validat. 2019;4:90–96.
Subramanian K, Pillai R. Quantitative study on DNA recovery efficiency from ceramic surfaces. J Adv Forensic Res. 2020;8:33–38.
Xu T, Lopez R. Role of surface texture in DNA yield from glass and plastic. Int Forensic Res Lett. 2019;10:15–20.
Pandey S, Raj A. Impact of sampling pressure on DNA yield from smooth surfaces. Forensic Stud Int. 2020;9:62–68.
Nascimento JL, Silva C. UV exposure and DNA degradation on smooth surfaces. Forensic Light Source J. 2020;6(1):33–37.
Das M, Verma N. Comparison of DNA collection buffers for field use. Pract Forensic Appl. 2020;9:44–49.
VanderWaal K. DNA extraction from difficult substrates: The silica method. J Forensic Sci. 2015;60(1).
Steele CH, Brown DW. Use of magnetic beads for DNA extraction from smooth surfaces. Forensic Sci Rev. 2015;29:205–210.
Hargrove PC, Fischer G. Magnetic bead-based extraction methods for touch DNA. Forensic Sci Int. 2020;311:73–78.
Lee JP, Chouhan S. Review of DNA extraction methods from non-porous surfaces. Forensic Sci J. 2016;33(1):40–47.
Prasad N, Mishra L. Use of direct PCR in touch DNA profiling. J Forensic Technol. 2017;15:72–76.
Mathews BL, Ramesh D. Automated systems for touch DNA profiling. Forensic Sci Autom. 2019;8:57–62.
Palkovits PD. Electrostatic lifting: A new frontier for touch DNA. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2014;4:254–257.
Patel R. Silica-based DNA extraction: The gold standard. Forensic Sci J. 2016;10:144–151.
Bennet A, Lee P. Swab texture and material composition in forensic sampling. Mater Sci Forensics. 2020;6:40–46.
Naidu M, Rajput P. Field sampling protocols for high-throughput trace DNA. Forensic Process Eng J. 2021;3(2):81–86.
Thompson R, Ali H. Decontamination protocols prior to DNA swabbing. Forensic Cleanliness Rep. 2018;5:19–24.
Tanaka M, Ko Y. Innovative adhesives for tape lifting of trace DNA. Forensic Adhes Tech Rev. 2021;5:62–67.
Zhang T, Dong X. Recovery of touch DNA from electronics and mobile devices. J Forensic Sci Technol. 2019;32.
Anderson M. Challenges in extracting touch DNA from metal objects. Forensic Sci Int. 2017;220:45–49.
Menon V, Thomas D. Efficiency of various buffer systems in touch DNA extraction. Biotech Forensics. 2018;13:39–45.
Das R, Pillai S. Vacuum-based DNA collection in field investigations. Forensic Sci Int Tech Tools. 2021;7:93–98.
Harshavardhan R, Patel M. Evaluating DNA persistence on mobile devices. Mobile Forensic Stud. 2021;4(1):23–28.
Parker D, Zhang Y. Humidity and temperature effects on DNA swab yields. Environ Forensic Rev. 2021;13(1):25–30.
Varma A, Joshi K. The forensic value of partial DNA profiles. J Forensic Pract. 2022;12(2):112–118.
Akhtar Z, Fernandes M. Quantification of touch DNA using qPCR. J Genet Forensics. 2018;17:88–94.
Watson P, Kim J. Stabilizing agents in DNA transport from field to lab. Forensic Handl Tech. 2020;10(2):49–54.
DeSilva T, Nair A. Direct PCR success rate on various non-porous substrates. J Forensic Genet. 2021;21:101–107.
Choi M, Yu L. Limitations in swab recovery efficiency across surface types. J Forensic Sampling. 2017;6(3):71–76.
Patel SK, Trivedi N. Biofilm formation impact on forensic DNA evidence. Forensic Microbiol Rep. 2020;5:33–38.
Gonzales ER, Mendes L. Factors affecting PCR inhibition from smooth surface residues. Genet Evid Res. 2018;11:80–85.
Cheung S, Park H. Optimizing storage conditions for DNA swabs. Evid Preserv J. 2020;7:43–48.
Prakash R, Saxena A. Portable DNA kits for field touch DNA recovery. J Rapid Forensic Methods. 2022;3:70–75.
Rahman T, Saha V. Storage tube contamination risks in touch DNA workflows. J Forensic Lab Pract. 2020;6(1):20–25.
Srivastava A, Desai R. Microbial contamination impact on trace DNA analysis. Biocontam Forensics. 2021;5(3):61–66.
Pathak D, Anand R. Low-copy DNA recovery methods: Field versus lab comparisons. Compar Forensic Sci. 2021;6(2):88–93.
Kumar R, Lalwani A. Statistical modeling of touch DNA yield variation. Forensic Prob Anal. 2021;4(1):22–27.
Mehra S, Sen K. Cleaning agents and their interference with trace DNA detection. Forensic Chem J. 2022;5(1):30–34.
Stover S. Comparative analysis of DNA extraction methods for non-porous surfaces. J Forensic Res. 2021;9(4).
Boyd P, Smith G. Use of FTA cards in touch DNA recovery. J Forensic DNA. 2017;9(2):102–107.
Goyal P, Nanda R. Cross-contamination risks in multi-touch forensic surfaces. J Crime Scene Contam Stud. 2021;3:88–92.
Noyes JM. DNA recovery from difficult substrates in forensic investigations. Forensic Sci Rev. 2017;23(2).
Binns LA, McCormick PH. DNA extraction from non-porous materials: Best practices. Forensic DNA Rev. 2015;16.
Amsel T. Optimizing collection and extraction methods for touch DNA on glass. FSI: Genetics. 2020;5:12–18.
Dube J, Kumar S. Enhancing DNA recovery from metal surfaces. Int J Forensic Sci. 2019;19:88–92.

Figures:

Contact

Editorial Office Emails:

[email protected]

Select by Volume & Issue

Submit Manuscript Information for Authors Advisory Board Rss Feed Articles Rss Feed

University/Institution

Select and search by University/Institution.

Articles by Country

Select and search by country to get related articles.

All Issues in 2025

January February March April May

All Issues in 2024

January February March April May June July August September October November December

All Issues in 2023

January February March April May June July August September October November December

Testmonials

I would like to thank JPRA for taking this decision. I understand the effort it represents for you. I'm truly happy to have the paper published in JPRA. And I'll certainly consider JPRA for my next publications as I was satisfied of the service provided, the efficiency and promptness of the interactions we had.

Emmanuel BUSATO

Publishing with the International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology was a rewarding experience as review process was thorough and brisk. Their visibility online is second to none as their published articles appear in all search engines. I will encourage researchers to publish with them.

Elizabeth Awoyesuku

“The choice to submit the forensic case study to the Journal of Addiction Therapy and Research was dictated by the match between the content and the potential readership. The publication process proved to be expedient and we were provided with constructive feedback from reviewers. The final article layout is attractive and conforms to standards. All-in-all, it has been a rewarding process.”

Elisabeth H Wiig

Archives of Vascular Medicine is one of the top class journal for vascular medicine with highly interesting topics. You did a professional and great Job!

Elias Noory

Thank you very much. I think the review process and all of what concerns the administration of the publication concerning our paper has been excellent. The nice and quick answers have been very good I think.

Doris Nilsson

Journal of Pulmonary and Respiratory Research is good journal for respiratory research purposes. It takes 2-3 weeks maximum for review of the manuscript to get published and any corrections to be made in the manuscript. It needs good articles and studies to get publish in the respiratory medicine. I am really glad that this journal editors helped me to get my case report published.

Divya Khanduja

Thanks you and your colleague for the great help for our publication. You always provide prompt responses and high quality of service. I am so happy to have you working with me. Thanks again!

Diana (Ding) Dai

Service and process were excellent as was the “look” of the article when published.

Deane Waldman

Great, thank you! It was very efficient working w/ your group. Very thorough reviews (i.e., plagiarism, peer, etc.). Would certainly recommend that future authors consider working w/ your group.

David W Brett

Your services are very good

Chukwuka Ireju Onyinye

I very much appreciate the humanitarian services provided in my stead by this journal/publisher. It exhibits total absence of editorial impertinence. As an Author, I have been guided to have a fruitful experience. The editorial care is highly commendable.

Chrysanthus Chukwuma

"An amazing experience with the Journal of Advanced Pediatrics and Child Health. Very fast blind review with pertinent corrections and suggestions. I highly recommand both the journal and the editor."

Chaimae Khairoun

The submission is very easy and the time from submission to response from the reviewers is short. Correspondence with the journal is nice and rapid.

Catrin Henriksson

The Clinical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology is an open access journal focused on scientific knowledge publication with emphasis laid on the fields of Gynecology and Obstetrics. Their services toward us have been encouraging through their kindness and respect. Great consideration has been given to us as young budding researchers and we are very grateful for this.

Carole Assontsa

During the process your positive communication, prompt feedback and professional approach is very highly appreciated. We would like to thank you very much for your support.

Can Vuran

I do appreciate for your service including submission, analysis, review, editorial and publishing process. I believe these esteemed journal enlighten the science with its high-quality personel.

Bora Uysal

I am very much pleased with the fast track publication by your reputed journal's editorial team. It is really helpful for researchers like me from developing nations. I strongly recommend your journal for publication.

Badri Kumar Gupta

It has been a fabulous journey writing articles for your journal because of the encouragement you people provide for writers from developing nations like India. Kindly continue the same. Looking forward for a long term association.

Badareesh Lakshminarayana

Many thanks for publishing my article in your great journal and the friendly and hassle-free publication process, the constructive peer-review, the regular feedback system, and the Quick response to any queries.

Azab Elsayed Azab

I would like to thank this journal for publishing my Research Article. Something I really appreciate about this journal is, they did not take much time from the day of Submission to the publishing date. Looking forward to have more publications in future.

Ayush Chandra

Submission of paper was smooth, the review process was fast. I had excellent communication and on time response from the editor.

Ayokunle Dada

Your service is very good and fast reply, also your service understand our situation and support us to publication our articles.

Ayman M Abu Mustafa

Really good service with prompt response. Looking forward to having long lasting relationship with your journal

Avishek Bagchi

Your service is excellent. Processing and editing were very fast. I hope to publish more of my works in your journal.

Ausraful Islam

I wanna to thank Clinical Journal of Nursing Care and Practice for its effort to review and publish my manuscript. This is reputable journal. Thank you!

Atsedemariam Andualem

“It was a delightful experience publishing my manuscript with the Clinical Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. They offered me lots of opportunities I never had from most publishing houses and their prompt services are greatly appreciated.”

Asafo Jones

I hope to ability to make some new investigation and publish in Your Company in future.

Artur Stopyra

I like the quality of the print & overall service. The paper looks quite impressive. Hope this will attract interested readers. All of you have our best wishes for continued success.

Arshad Khan

Your big support from researchers around the world is the best appreciation from your scientific teams. We believe that there should be no barrier in science and you make it real and this motto come true.

Arefhosseinir Rafi

Your journal co-operation is very appreciable and motivational. I am really thankful to your journal and team members for the motivation and collaboration to publish my work.

Assistant Professor, UCLAS Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, India

Archna Dhasmana

I am glad to submit the article to Heighten Science Publications as it has a very smooth and fast peer-review process, which enables the researchers to communicate their work on time.

Anupam M

This is to specify that I have had an extensive and detailed interaction with the Editorial team of Annals of Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, USA, lasting over a significant period of time. My interaction has been extremely pleasant, especially with Ms Allie Smith, as I find the communication quite inspiring and crystal clear. The attitude of aforesaid individuals is quite helpful and guiding in pertinent instances. It has been a commemorative journey so far working with the Journal and I hope that the symbiosis will continue, evolve and flourish in the forthcoming years. I wish the journal, related personnel and aforementioned individuals a fruitful, successful run.

New Delhi, India

Anubha Bajaj

We appreciate the fact that you decided to give us full waiver for the applicable charges and approve the final version. You did an excellent job preparing the PDF version. Of course we will consider your magazine for our future submissions and we will pay the applicable fees then.

Anna Dionysopoulou

''Co-operation of Archives of Surgery and Clinical Research journal is appreciable. I'm impressed at the promptness of the publishing staff and the professionalism displayed. Thank you very much for your support, help and encouragement.''

Anıl Gokce

Congratulations for the excellence of your journal and high quality of its publications.

Angel MARTIN CASTELLANOS

The service from the journal staff has been excellent.

Andy Smith

I was very pleased with the quick editorial process. We are sure that our paper will have great visibility, among other things due to its open access. We believe in science accessible to all.

Anderson Fernando de Souza

It was a great experience publishing through JCICM. The article has reached out to several institutions. Appreciate your professional work. Hope to work with you again

Anas Wardeh

Publishing an article is a long process, but working with your publication department made things go smoothly, even though the process took exactly 5 months from the time of submitting the article till the time I have favourable response, the missing part is the peer review details, which is essential in self auditing and future improvement, overall experience was excellent giving your understanding of the situation of lack of financial institution support.

Anas Diab

I think that Heighpubs very good. You are very helpful. Thank you for everything.

Ana Ribeiro

Regarding to be services, we note that are work with high standards of professionalism translated into quick response, efficiency which makes communication accessible. Furthermore, I believe to be much inviting for the submission of future works for publication purposes.

Amélia João Alice Nkutxi

I would like to mention that I had a wonderful experience working with HSPI. The whole process right from manuscript submission to peer review till the publication of the article was very prompt & efficient. I wish you good luck for the future.

Amarjeet Gambhir

Once I submitted the manuscript, the response time of the reviewers was very fast. The fine-tuning of the galley proof was likewise prompt. I believe the journal provide a valuable outlet to disseminate physical rehabilitation scientific knowledge to the clinical community. Respectfully. Dr. Alon

Alon

We really appreciate and thanks the full waiver you provide for our article. We happy to publish our paper in your journal. Thank you very much for your good support and services.

Ali Abusafia

It was a real pleasure working with your team. The review was done fast, and it was very clear, the editing was flawless, the article was published quickly compared to other journals, and everyone was understanding and helpful. I will gladly recommend this journal to my acquaintances in academia.

Alexandra Cozma

To the editorial team at HSPI and the Journal of Clinical Nephrology: Thank you so much for your hard work and collaboration in bringing our article to life. Your staff was responsive, flexible, and communicative and made the process smooth and easy. Thank you!

Alejandro Munoz

Dear colleagues! I am satisfied with our cooperation with you. Your service is at a high level. I hope for a future relationship. Let me know if I can get a paper version of the magazine with my articles from you. I see them on the Internet.

Aksenov V.V

"This is my first time publishing with the journal/publisher. I am impressed at the promptness of the publishing staff and the professionalism displayed. Thank you for encouraging young researchers like me!"

Ajite Kayode

I want to thank you for our collaboration. You were fast and effective with a positive spirit of teamwork. I am truly excited from our collaboration. You were like always fast, efficient and accurate. I hope that in the near future we will collaborate again.

Aikaterini Solomou

In my opinion, you provide a very fast and practical service.

Ahmet Eroglu

Great, We are too comfortable with the process including the peer review process and quality. But, the journal should be indexed in different databases such scopus.

Afework Edmealem

We really appreciate your efforts towards our article, the professional way you handle our request for exemption from charges. It was a great honor for us to publish in your magazine.

Achraf elbakkaly

I really liked the ease of submitting my manuscript in the HSPI journal. Further, the peer review was timely completed and I was communicated the final decision on my manuscript within 10 days of submission which is really appreciable. I strongly recommend all the scientists and researchers to submit their work in this journal”

Abu Bashar

My candid opinion is that the service you render is second to none. My favourite part is the prompt response to issue, really i value that.

Abiodun Akanbi Adeogun

Thank you very much for accepting our manuscript in your journal “International Journal of Clinical Virology”. We are very thankful to the esteemed team for timely response and quick review process. The editorial team of International Journal of Clinical Virology is too cooperative and well-mannered during the publication process. We are hopeful to publish many quality papers in your journal and I suggest the International Journal of Clinical Virology to all of my colleagues, researchers and friends to publish their research here.

Abdul Baset

I, Muhammad Sarwar Khan, am serving as Editor on Archives of Biotechnology and Biomedicine (ABB). I submitted an editorial titled, 'Edible vaccines to combat Infectious Bursal Disease of poultry' for publication in ABB. After submitting the manuscript; the services rendered by the management and technical personnel to handle and process the manuscript were marvelous. Plagiarism report was shared with me with complements before reviewers' comments, All steps including article processing and service charges were well taken care of keeping in view the author's interest/preference. All together, it was an encouraging and wonderful experience working with ABB personnel.

University of Agriculture, Pakistan

Muhammad Sarwar Khan

Your journal has accomplished its intended mission of providing very effective and efficient goals in dealing with submissions, conducting the reviewing process and in publishing accepted manuscripts in a timely manner. Keep up the great work and services that you provide.

University of Jacqmar, Inc., USA

John St. Cyr

I am to express my view that Heighten Science Publications are reliable quick even after peer review process. I hope and wish the publications will go a long way in disseminating science to many interested in scientific research.

College of Fisheries, CAU(I), Tripura, India

Ajit Kumar Roy

The Journal Clinical Nephrology provides a good opportunity for readers to stay updated in the field of clinical nephrology. Additionally - it provides a good opportunity for authors to publish their work. 1. Publication of the accepted manuscripts is sufficiently rapid. 2. The trust factor between the journal and me, as an author, is very important and well preserved. 3. Peer review process very rapid and effective.

Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Israel

Leonid Feldman

In 2017, I submitted a manuscript to the journal Archives of Biotechnology and Biomedicine belonging to Heighten Science Publications Corporation. Within one week I already received the response from the editor. All processing steps were really fast so in terms of a speedy publication I can particularly recommend the journal Archives of Biotechnology and Biomedicine. The responsible contact person of the journal was always available, which gives a trustworthy impression to the author. Also the peer review process was clear and constructive. So from my experience with Heighten Science Publications Corporation I can recommend publishing there.

University of Tubingen, Germany

Yvonne Mast

We thank to the heighten science family, who speed up the publication of our article and provide every support.

Mehmet Besir

The services of the journal were excellent. The most important thing for an author is the speed of the peer review which was really fast here. They returned in a few days and immediately replied all of my questions. I want to refer this platform to all scholars. Many thanks.

Eastern Mediterranean University, Cyprus

Zehra Guchan TOPCU

Thank you for your attitude and support. I am sincerely grateful to you and the entire staff of the magazine for the high professionalism and fast quality work. Thank you very much!

USA

Igor Klepikov

Thank you and your company for effective support of authors which are very much dependable on the funds gambling for science in the different countries of our huge and unpredictable world. We are doing our work and should rely on a teams like Galley Proof-HSPC. Great success to all of you for the 2019th! Be well all the year long.

Russia

Victor V Apollonov

The editorial process was quickly done. The galley proof was sent within a week after being accepted for publication. The editorial team was very helpful and responded promptly.

India

Rohit Kulshrestha

University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Nigeria

Dr. Elizabeth A Awoyesuku

"It was a pleasure to work with the editorial team of the journal on the submission of the manuscript. The team was professional, fast, and to the point".

NC A&T State University, USA

Moran Sciamama-Saghiv

Submission of paper was smooth, the review process was fast. I had excellent communication and on time response from the editor.

Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Nigeria

Ayokunle Dada

I am delighted and satisfied with. Heighten Science Publications as my manuscript was thoroughly assessed and published on time without delay. Keep up the good work.

Ido-Ekiti/Afe Babalola University, Nigeria

Dr. Shuaib Kayode Aremu

Ekiti State University, Nigeria

Adebukola Ajite

I wanna to thank clinical journal of nursing care and practice for its effort to review and publish my manuscript. This is reputable journal. Thank you!

Wollo University, Ethiopia

Atsedemariam Andualem

We appreciate your approach to scholars and will encourage you to collaborate with your organization, which includes interesting and different medical journals. With the best wishes of success, creativity and joy in life, prosperity in the medical field.

Ivano- Frankivsk National Medical University, Ukraine

Nataliya Kitsera

Thank you very much for your support and encouragement. I am truly impressed by your tolerance and support. Thank you very much

Diaverum: PADC, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia

Nasrulla Abutaleb

You are such a nice person. Your journal co-operation is very appreciable and motivational.

Department of Biotechnology, Uttaranchal college of Applied and Life Sciences, Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India

Archna Dhasmana

“Mobile apps and wearable technology are becoming ubiquitous in our environment. Their integration with healthcare delivery is just beginning to take shape. The early results are promising and the possibilities great."

BS, PharmD., MBA, CPHIMS, FHIMSS, Adjunct Professor, Global Healthcare Management, MCPHS University, Chief Strategy Offi cer, MedicaSoft, Senior Advisor, National Health IT (NHIT) Collaborative for Underserved, New York HIMSS, National Liaison, Health 2.0 Boston, Past Chair, Chair Innovation, USA

Helen Figge

Ph.D, Boston University Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders and Knowledge Research Institute, Inc., 2131 Reflection Bay Drive, Arlington, Texas 76013, USA