Difference between Fingerprint Patterns among the South Indian and North Indian Population
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: The study of fingerprint identification is known as Dactylography or Dactyloscopy. With advances in the field of forensic sciences, fingerprints have been used as a very Effective means of establishing the identity of the individual. A fingerprint is considered to be the most accurate and reliable indicator in identification.
Objectives: The present study was conducted on 200 north Indian and south Indian subjects to determine the individuality and the predominant fingerprint pattern among both populations.
Subjects and materials: 200 people which consisting of 50 males and 50 females having the north Indian origin, and 50 males and 50 females having the south Indian origin, were included for this study. The subjects selected were in the age range between 18 and 25 years. Fingerprints were obtained using an inked stamp pad.
Results: Each type of Fingerprint pattern was identified and analysed for gender differences and its Distribution in the population. The most frequent fingerprint pattern was ulnar loop in the total population, as well as in the sex wise distribution.
Conclusion: This diversity in fingerprint patterns between the two populations highlights the need for further investigation into linking Individuals to specific groups across a wider range of populations. Therefore, it is imperative to conduct similar studies on a larger scale to enhance the accuracy of predictions and establish the unique characteristics of everyone.
Article Details
Copyright (c) 2015 Amir A, et al.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Bansal HD, Badiye AD, Kapoor NS. Distribution of fingerprint patterns in an Indian population. Malays J Forensic Sci. 2014;5(2):18–21. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272676488_Distribution_of_Fingerprint_Patterns_in_an_Indian_Population
Berry J, Stoney DA. The history and development of fingerprinting. In: Lee HC, Gaensslen RE, editors. Advances in Fingerprint Technology. 2nd ed. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2001;13–52.
Bleay SM, Croxton RS, De Puit M. Fingerprint Development Techniques: Theory and Application. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2018. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/book/10.1002/9781119187400
Nagar V, Tripathi K, Aseri V, Mavry B, Chopade RL, Verma R, et al. Latent friction ridge analysis of developed fingerprints after treatment with various liquid materials on a porous surface. Mater Today Proc. 2022;69:1532–1536. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.04.619
Binorkar SV, Kulkarni AB. Study on the fingerprint pattern and gender distribution in and around the Nanded district of Maharashtra State. Int J Forensic Med Invest. 2017;3(1):12–18.
Yao Z, Le Bars JM, Charrier C, Rosenberger C. Literature review of fingerprint quality assessment and its evaluation. IET Biometrics. 2016;5(3):243–251. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-bmt.2015.0027
Valdes-Ramirez D, Medina-Pérez MA, Monroy R, Loyola-González O, Rodríguez J, Morales A, et al. A review of fingerprint feature representations and their applications for latent fingerprint identification: trends and evaluation. IEEE Access. 2019;PP(99):1–1. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2909497
Chandana S, Yadav S, Mathuria M. Fingerprint recognition based on minutiae information. Int J Eng Res Technol. 2015;120(10):39–42. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5120/21265-3862
Hassan A, Tripathi A, Kumar A, Patel A, Singh KS, Kalsi R, et al. Study of fingerprint patterns in the North Indian population. IOSR J Dent Med Sci. 2020;19(3 Suppl 9):31–34. Available from: https://www.iosrjournals.org/iosr-jdms/papers/Vol19-issue3/Series-9/F1903093134.pdf