Abstract

Literature Review

A Prospective Study to Determine Any Correlation between Unnatural Death, Life Line, and Hand Anthropometry

Mohammed Iliyas Sheikh*, Abhilasha Dwivedi and Jayeshkumar Kanani

Published: 11 August, 2025 | Volume 9 - Issue 2 | Pages: 144-149

A study of palm lines, various landmarks on the hand, and their correlation with the hand's anthropometric dimensions may sometimes help predict various future events in the life of an individual. We try to find out any correlation between these appearances and the sudden death of an individual. In the present study, we collected data from an individual’s hand after carefully breaking the rigor mortis in the deceased brought for medicolegal postmortem examination and measured the different dimensions. The data were then subjected to statistical analysis. 
The article may help rule out the cultural belief about the study of the lifeline and age at the time of death. Palmistry is a self-interpretation of changes in or around the lifeline by an individual, and it varies from person to person. There is no concrete literature proof available that suggests its importance in ascertaining the age of the individual.
We also observed that there is no close relation between the age interpreted by the lifeline and the biological age of the individual. Our study shows that the individual either lives too long or too short compared to age by the lifeline.
We observed that unnatural deaths are more common in young individuals, and males outnumber females. According to the cause of death, hanging, accident, and poisoning are the most common, followed by sudden death and homicide. In our study, we observed that there is no correlation between unnatural death and the lifeline of an individual and age at the time of death.

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.jfsr.1001094 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

Keywords:

Unnatural deaths; Hand creases; Anthropometry; Lifeline; Sudden death

References

  1. West P. The lifeline. In: Lifelines. Wellingborough: Aquarian Press; 1987. Chapter 9.
  2. King F. Principal lines of the hand. In: Palmistry. London: Macdonald; 1987. Chapter 4.
  3. DeSalvo D, editor. Cheiro's language of the hand. London: Simon and Schuster; 1987.
  4. Ramasamy K, Srinivasan A. Medical Palmistry: An Artistic Analysis and Future beyond Lexical Meaning. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Srinivasa Ramanujan Centre, SASTRA University, Kumbakonam. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-360X.2017.00731.4
  5. Cheiro's Language of The Hand. Part I - Cheirognomy. 25.
  6. Sneha Sl. Lifelines as a Tool to Predict Death. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020;14(1).
  7. Newrick PG, Affie E, Corrall RJ. Relationship between longevity and lifeline: a manual study of 100 patients. J R Soc Med. 1990;83(8):499–501. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1177/014107689008300809
  8. Lucas T, Dhugga A, Henneberg M. Predicting longevity from the line of life: is it accurate? Anthropol Rev. 2019;82(2):155–162. Available from: https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2019-0011
  9. Cheiro's Language of the Hand [Internet]. Available from: http://www.archive.org/details/cheiroslanguageoOOhamo
  10. Palmistry – The Lines of The Hand – Part III: A Compilation.
  11. Bishop YMM, Fienberg SE, Holland PW. Discrete multivariate analysis: theory and practice. Cambridge (MA): The MIT Press. 1975.
  12. Knipschild P. Looking for gall bladder disease in the patient's iris. Br Med J. 1988;297:1578–81. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.297.6663.1578
  13. Model D. Smoker's face: an underrated clinical sign? Br Med J. 1985;291:1760–2. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.291.6511.1760
  14. Basu K. India’s demographic dividend. BBC News. 2018.
  15. GeoBase [Internet]. [Accessed 2019 Mar 25]. Available from: http://www.geoba.se/population.php?pc=world
  16. Kassell L. Stars, spirits, and signs: towards a history of astrology. Stud Hist Philos Sci C Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2010;41(2):67–69. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2010.04.001
  17. Bennett J, Donohue M, Schneider N, Voit M. The cosmic perspective. 4th ed. San Francisco (CA): Pearson/Addison-Wesley. 2007;82–84.
  18. Pingree DE, Gilbert RA. Astrology – Astrology in modern times. Encyclopædia Britannica [Internet]. [Accessed 2018 Oct 8]. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/topic/astrology
  19. Vyse SA. Believing in Magic: The Psychology of Superstition. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 20.
  20. Saint-Germain. The practice of palmistry. Chicago: Laird and Lee. 1897;148. Available from: https://iapsop.com/ssoc/1897__saint-germain___practice_of_palmistry____v2.pdf
  21. MysticScripts.com [Internet]. [Accessed 2019 Mar 25]. Available from: http://www.mysticscripts.com/palmistry/

Figures:

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Figure 1

Figure 3

Figure 1

Figure 4

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More

Help ?