Abstract

Research Article

Economic disparities and suicides: The dynamic panel data analyses of 50 states in the United States

Bruce Q Swan*

Published: 16 March, 2021 | Volume 5 - Issue 1 | Pages: 020-029

The economic inequalities associated with suicide risks among 50 states in the United States were identified in this paper to form the dynamic panel data set from 1981 to 2016. The effects of growing income inequalities on suicides in the Unites States were estimated using the Arellano–Bond method. This paper is the first to associate the social inequalities with suicides using the state-level dynamic panel data in America. It is found that the change of unemployment rates significantly and positively impact the changes of the overall suicides rates, female and male suicides rates. The changes of Top 10% income index are uniformly positive to the change of female, male and overall state-level suicide rates. The Gini index has positive correspondence within the overall and female groups, along with the insignificantly vague evidence within the male groups. The potential endogeneity problem inferring from the fixed effect estimation has been also investigated accordingly.

JEL Classification: A13, A14, I18. 

Read Full Article HTML DOI: 10.29328/journal.jfsr.1001023 Cite this Article Read Full Article PDF

Keywords:

Dynamic panel data; Suicide; Economic inequality; Arellano-Bond estimate; Gini index

References

  1. World Health Organization. Mental Health, Suicide data. 2012.
  2. The U.S. Census Bureau. 2012. https://www.census.gov/topics/income-poverty/wealth.html
  3. World Data Bank. Datasets of the United States. 2010. https://data.worldbank.org/country/united-states
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention & National Center for Health Statistics. Suicide Mortality by State. 2016.
  5. Meyer PA, Yoon PW, Kaufmann RB, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC Health Disparities and Inequalities Report — United States. 2013; 62: 3-5. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24264483/
  6. Sun B, Zhang J. Economic and Sociological Correlates of Suicides: Multilevel Analysis of the Time Series Data in the United Kingdom. J Forensic Sci. 2016; 61: 345-351. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27404607/
  7. Antonio A. Income Inequality, Unemployment, and Suicide: A Panel Data Analysis of 15 European Countries. Appl Economics. 2005; 37: 439-451.
  8. Timothy C, Richard D. The effect of job loss and unemployment duration on suicide risk in the United States: a new look using mass‐layoffs and unemployment duration. Health Econom. 2012; 21: 338-350. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21322087/
  9. Andres AR, Halicioglu F. Determinants of Suicides in Denmark: Evidence from Time Series Data. Health Policy. 2010; 98: 263–269. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20667618/
  10. Phillips J. Factors Associated With Temporal and Spatial Patterns in Suicide Rates Across U.S. States, 1976–2000. Demography. 2013; 50: 591-614. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23196429/
  11. Hintikka J, Saarinen PI, Viinamaki H. Suicide mortality in Finland during an economic cycle, 1985–1995. Scand J Pub Health. 1999; 27: 85–88. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10421714/
  12. Adler NE, Newman K. Socioeconomic Disparities In Health: Pathways And Policies. Health Aff. 2002; 21: 60-76. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11900187/
  13. Adler NE, Rehkopf DH. U.S. disparities in health: descriptions, causes, and mechanisms. Ann Rev Public Health. 2008; 29: 235-252. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18031225/
  14. Ceccherini-Nelli A, Priebe S. Economic Factors and Suicide Rates: Associations over Time in Four Countries. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011; 46: 975-982. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20652218/
  15. Yang B, Stack S, Lester D. Suicide and Unemployment: Predicting the Smoothed Trend and Yearly Fluctuations. Soc Eco. 1992; 39-41.
  16. Stack S. Suicide: A 15-Year Review of the Sociological Literature. Part I: Cultural and Economic Factors. Suicide Life Threat Behav. 2000; 30: 145-162. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10888055/
  17. Swan TT, Sun B, Floss F. Looking at the taxation effect on cross-state smuggling using rational addiction models. J Econo Stud. 2019; 46: 652-670.
  18. Frank, Mark. W. A New State-Level Panel of Annual Inequality Measures over the Period 1916 – 2005. J Business Strategies. 2014; 31: 241-263.
  19. National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. AHRQ. 2017; 17-0001.
  20. Manuel A, Stephen B. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econo Stud. 1991; 58: 277.
  21. Manual S. Arellano–Bond linear dynamic panel-data. 2014.
  22. Lin YH, Chen WY. Does unemployment have asymmetric effects on suicide rates? Evidence from the United States: 1928–2013.” Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2018; 31: 1.
  23. Inagaki K. Income inequality and the suicide rate in Japan: Evidence from cointegration and LA-VAR. J Appl Econo. 2010; 13: P113-133.
  24. Hiyoshi A, Kondo N, Rostila M. Increasing income-based inequality in suicide mortality among working-age women and men, Sweden, 1990–2007: is there a point of trend change? J Epidemiol Commun Health. 2018; 72: 1009-1015. PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30021795/
  25. Jalles JT. Andresen MA. The social and economic determinants of suicide in Canadian provinces. Health Econom Rev. 2015; 5: 1-12. PubMed: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4314828
  26. Pierce J, Schott P. Trade Liberalization and Mortality: Evidence from US Counties. Am Econo Rev Insights. 2020; 2: 47-64.
  27. Autor D, Dorn D, Hanson G. When Work Disappears: Manufacturing Decline and the Falling Marriage-Market Value of Young Men. NBER Working Paper No. 23173. 2017.

Figures:

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 1

Figure 2

Similar Articles

Recently Viewed

Read More

Most Viewed

Read More